The American Council on Education (ACE) is ushering in a new era of college rankings by redefining how institutions are classified based on their impact on social and economic mobility. This shift comes as part of ACE's comprehensive overhaul of the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, a system widely used to categorize and evaluate colleges and universities.

Redefining Success: A Focus on Social and Economic Mobility

ACE's decision to revamp the Carnegie Classification reflects a broader effort to move away from traditional metrics like research funding and selectivity towards a more holistic evaluation of institutional effectiveness. Central to this new approach is the introduction of a "social and economic mobility" classification, which will assess institutions based on their ability to provide a "springboard to a better life" for students.

This new classification marks a significant departure from conventional ranking systems, which often prioritize factors like endowment size and acceptance rates. Instead, ACE's framework emphasizes access and outcomes, seeking to measure not just who enrolls in college, but also what happens to them after they graduate.

Measuring Access: A Focus on Diversity and Inclusion

One key aspect of the new classification is the focus on access, specifically the socioeconomic and racial diversity of students enrolled in colleges and universities. ACE plans to assess institutions based on the proportion of Pell Grant-eligible and non-white students they enroll, compared to the demographics of the regions they serve.

By examining enrollment data in this way, ACE aims to recognize institutions that are effectively serving diverse student populations and providing opportunities to those who may not have access to higher education otherwise. This approach acknowledges the role that colleges and universities play in promoting social mobility and economic equity.

Assessing Outcomes: A Focus on Post-Graduation Success

In addition to access, ACE's classification will also consider economic outcomes, particularly the earnings of students after they leave college. By analyzing the economic success of graduates, adjusted for factors like geographic location and race, ACE hopes to provide a more nuanced understanding of how colleges contribute to students' long-term financial well-being.

This focus on outcomes is not without controversy, as some critics argue that measuring success solely based on earnings overlooks the broader value of a college education. However, ACE asserts that while earnings are not the only measure of success, they are an important indicator of how well colleges are fulfilling their mission to prepare students for the workforce.

Addressing Criticisms and Challenges

Despite its potential benefits, ACE's new classification system is not without its challenges. One major concern is the potential for bias, particularly in how earnings data is interpreted. Critics worry that colleges with diverse student bodies, who may face discrimination in the job market, could be unfairly penalized under this new system.

To address this issue, ACE plans to compare the earnings of graduates to the salaries of individuals in similar fields and locations, taking into account racial and geographic disparities. This approach aims to provide a more accurate assessment of how well colleges are preparing students for success in the real world.

Another criticism of the new classification system is its emphasis on economic outcomes, which some argue fails to recognize the value of non-traditional career paths. Patricia McGuire, president of Trinity Washington University, argues that defining success solely in terms of salary overlooks the contributions of fields like teaching, social work, and public advocacy, which may not be as financially lucrative but are essential for society.

Looking Ahead: Implications for Higher Education

As ACE moves forward with its plan to redefine college rankings, the implications for higher education could be significant. Institutions that have historically focused on access and student outcomes, particularly those serving diverse and low-income populations, may see increased recognition and support.

Furthermore, the shift towards a more holistic approach to evaluating institutional success could lead to changes in how colleges and universities prioritize their resources. Institutions may begin to place greater emphasis on programs and initiatives that promote social mobility and economic equity, aligning more closely with their stated missions.

ACE's new approach to classifying colleges based on social and economic mobility represents a significant departure from traditional ranking systems. By prioritizing access and outcomes, ACE aims to provide a more comprehensive and equitable assessment of institutional effectiveness. While challenges remain, the potential benefits for higher education and society at large are substantial, paving the way for a more inclusive and impactful system of higher education.