Howard Swerdloff, a seasoned lecturer with 14 years of experience in Rutgers University's Writing Program, was gearing up to commemorate the anniversary of a historic faculty strike when he received devastating news: he would not have a job in the fall. This abrupt revelation came as a shock to Swerdloff and many of his colleagues, who, unlike tenure-track faculty, operate on annual contracts that are subject to renewal.

According to an email from Lynda Dexheimer, the executive director of the writing program, at least 29 out of 31 writing lecturers will not be returning in the fall semester. This decision, which affects a significant portion of the program's faculty, has sent ripples of uncertainty and distress through the academic community.

Impact on Education Quality

The Rutgers Writing Program, renowned for its size and influence, plays a crucial role in shaping the academic experience of undergraduate students. With one-third of the campus's 40,000 undergraduates enrolled in its courses, the program holds substantial sway over the development of writing skills among students. However, the decision to increase class sizes beyond recommended limits raises concerns about the quality of education that students will receive.

Union leaders argue that the current class size cap of 22 already exceeds the maximum recommended by national academic organizations. By further increasing class sizes, the university risks overburdening lecturers and disadvantaging students who rely on smaller class settings for effective learning.

Uncertain Future for Educators

For many lecturers, the news of their impending job loss came as a devastating blow. Some, like Swerdloff, have dedicated decades of their lives to teaching at Rutgers, only to find themselves facing an uncertain future. The lack of job security for adjunct faculty means that their livelihoods are directly tied to the availability of courses, leaving them vulnerable to sudden changes in enrollment and programmatic decisions.

Additionally, the university's decision to eliminate many advanced writing courses further compounds the challenges facing both educators and students. While the rationale behind these changes is linked to fluctuations in student demand and curriculum adjustments, the consequences for faculty members are profound and far-reaching.

From Celebration to Protest

What was meant to be a celebratory occasion marking the gains achieved through last year's faculty strike quickly turned into a protest against the university's decision to cut the writing program. Faculty union members, along with students, gathered to voice their opposition to the layoffs and the detrimental impact on academic quality.
Last year's strike resulted in significant victories for adjunct faculty, including raises and improved job security. However, the recent cuts to the writing program threaten to undermine these hard-fought gains, leaving many educators feeling disillusioned and betrayed.

As the academic community grapples with the fallout from these decisions, the future of higher education at Rutgers and beyond hangs in the balance. The plight of adjunct faculty highlights broader issues of job insecurity and the precarious nature of academic employment, underscoring the need for greater support and recognition for all members of the academic community.