In response to persistent calls for better data on student outcomes in higher education, House Republicans have introduced a proposal for a postsecondary student data system. However, this proposed system comes with limitations, as it would only count students who receive federal assistance for their education.
READ ALSO: Data Integrity as a Code (DiaC): Best Practices for Organizations
Lack of Comprehensive Data Hinders Higher Education Oversight
The absence of comprehensive data on student outcomes has long been a challenge for policymakers and advocates seeking to improve accountability and transparency in higher education. Since 2008, federal law has prohibited the creation of a new database of student-level information, complicating efforts to assess the effectiveness of various programs and initiatives.
Advocates argue that existing data systems are fragmented and fail to capture important aspects of student success. For example, graduation rate calculations typically exclude part-time and transfer students, providing an incomplete picture of overall student outcomes. This lack of comprehensive data undermines efforts to evaluate the impact of federal investments in higher education and address disparities in student outcomes.
Moreover, Mamie Voight, president and CEO of the Institute for Higher Education Policy, emphasized the need for a more robust data system. She stated, "The current system is very incomplete, and piecemeal, and in some places duplicative and kind of convoluted."
Renewed Efforts to Address Data Gaps
Despite the longstanding ban on creating a new student-level data system, bipartisan support has emerged for legislation aimed at improving data collection and reporting in higher education. The College Transparency Act (CTA), first proposed in 2017, seeks to establish a comprehensive data system that includes information on student enrollment, completion rates, and other key measures for all programs and degree levels.
Recently, House Republicans, led by Virginia Foxx, chair of the House education committee, introduced a modified version of the CTA. Foxx's proposal would create a postsecondary student data system limited primarily to students who receive federal financial aid. While this represents a departure from previous iterations of the CTA, it signals a potential breakthrough in addressing long-standing data gaps in higher education.
Debate Over Privacy and Data Coverage
Foxx's proposal has reignited debates over privacy and data coverage in higher education. While proponents argue that limiting the data system to students who receive federal assistance protects privacy, critics contend that it excludes a significant portion of the student population and undermines the system's overall effectiveness.
Advocacy organizations and higher education groups have raised concerns that Foxx's proposal would exclude a substantial number of students, particularly those attending community colleges and nontraditional institutions. This limited coverage could distort data and impede efforts to accurately assess student outcomes and program effectiveness.
Moreover, Craig Lindwarm, vice president of governmental affairs at the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, highlighted the significance of Foxx's proposal. He stated, "It's a fundamental new day... The disagreement is no longer on whether to create a student-level data network but rather how to do it. This is a pretty significant development."
Impact and Future Outlook
Despite the ongoing disagreements, Foxx's proposal represents a significant development in the effort to improve data collection and transparency in higher education. While challenges remain, there is growing recognition of the need for comprehensive data systems that provide policymakers, institutions, and students with the information they need to make informed decisions about higher education.
As discussions continue, stakeholders will need to find common ground to ensure that any proposed data system effectively addresses the complex challenges facing higher education today. Ultimately, the goal is to create a data infrastructure that promotes equity, accountability, and student success across the higher education landscape.
