Florida International University (FIU) has decided to terminate several partnerships with Chinese universities to adhere to a state law restricting public institutions' ties with "countries of concern." This move impacts various programs, including a dual-degree Spanish language program, engineering exchanges, and a prominent hospitality initiative.
Political Scrutiny and Financial Gifts
FIU's decision follows heightened scrutiny by Florida's Board of Governors, prompted by millions of dollars in gifts from Chinese institutions. A former Republican representative, Jose Oliva, raised concerns over the $3.2 million received in the 2021-22 academic year. FIU Graduate School Dean Andrew Gil explained that the funds were linked to educational programs in China, and the university was actively working on terminating these programs.
The closures align with regulatory changes by the Florida Board of Governors and a law intensifying oversight of university partnerships and exchanges with specific countries, signed in 2021 and expanded in the subsequent year. FIU's foreign gift investigation revealed the university received the most gifts among state institutions, amounting to $27 million, with a focus on collaborative programs and exchange initiatives.
Compliance with State Law
FIU's decision to end collaborations with Chinese universities is rooted in its commitment to comply with a state law aimed at regulating public institutions' associations with "countries of concern." The termination affects various programs, notably a dual-degree Spanish language program, engineering exchanges with seven Chinese institutions, and a thriving dual-degree hospitality program run in partnership with the Tianjin University of Commerce.
The university's actions come in response to heightened scrutiny from Florida's Board of Governors, a politically appointed body overseeing public higher education institutions in the state. The scrutiny was prompted by substantial financial gifts from Chinese institutions, particularly the $3.2 million received by FIU during the 2021-22 academic year. At a board meeting in June, concerns were raised, leading to discussions with FIU's Graduate School Dean Andrew Gil, who explained that steps were being taken to terminate programs associated with these funds.
The closures of these programs are part of a broader trend, reflecting changes in state regulations and laws governing international partnerships. The Florida Board of Governors revised its regulations for certain programs in the spring of 2023, contributing to the closure of FIU's hospitality program in China and two smaller initiatives. Additionally, a law signed in 2021 and expanded in the subsequent year heightened oversight, affecting joint ventures and hiring.
The move to comply with the new law led FIU to pause the recruitment of researchers from specified countries in December, aligning with actions taken by other public universities in the state. This broader shift indicates a growing trend of increased scrutiny and regulatory control over international collaborations, particularly with countries like China.
Unintended Consequences on Internationalization
While the decision to end partnerships aligns with state regulations, critics argue that the current environment reflects a broader trend of ideological concerns overshadowing educational and economic considerations. William Brustein, an international education administrator, likens the situation to the McCarthy era, where political considerations in the Cold War era took precedence over educational opportunities.
The closure of FIU's hospitality program in Tianjin, a significant and successful initiative, has raised eyebrows. Established in 2006, the program has been a cornerstone of Sino-American university partnerships, contributing to educational and cultural exchange. The abrupt termination of such programs, even those seemingly benign in nature, raises questions about the balance between political considerations and the potential loss of educational and economic opportunities.
FIU's decision to end partnerships with Chinese universities reflects a broader trend of increasing scrutiny and regulatory control over international collaborations. While compliance with state laws and regulations is essential, the unintended consequences on educational and cultural exchange highlight the challenges faced by institutions in navigating the complex landscape of international partnerships. As geopolitical tensions continue, it remains to be seen how these decisions will impact the future of educational collaborations and the broader landscape of internationalization in higher education.
