New York's Tuition Assistance Program (TAP), once a beacon of financial support for lower- and middle-class students pursuing higher education, is now under scrutiny by the chairs of the higher education committees in the Legislature.

Assemblymember Pat Fahy and Sen. Toby Stavisky contend that the program has failed to keep pace with inflation and has witnessed a decline in its effectiveness over the years. As they advocate for changes, their proposals aim to address the evolving needs of students, rising tuition costs, and the imperative to foster diversity on college campuses.

Revitalizing New York's Tuition Assistance Program: Legislators Call for Reforms to Aid Lower and Middle-Class Students
UNSPLASH / Towfiqu Barbhuiya

The Erosion of TAP's Effectiveness

One significant factor contributing to the decline in TAP's impact is the program's failure to adjust for inflation. Until 2011, the maximum TAP award was aligned with SUNY and CUNY tuition rates, ensuring that it covered the full cost of education. However, with the discontinuation of this practice, the maximum TAP award has fallen behind the escalating tuition rates. While SUNY tuition has surged to around $7,000, the maximum TAP award currently stands at $5,665, creating a gap that leaves many students struggling to cover the cost of their education.

Assemblymember Fahy and Sen. Stavisky are calling for a reinstatement of the practice of matching the TAP award with SUNY and CUNY tuition rates, a move aimed at restoring the program's original intent of providing comprehensive financial aid.

Raising the Income Threshold

In addition to addressing the issue of inflation, the legislators propose an increase in the family income threshold from $80,000 to $122,000. The current threshold, stagnant for the past 24 years, no longer accurately represents the financial realities of many families. As Assemblymember Fahy notes, the $80,000 limit is no longer indicative of a middle-class income for a significant portion of the state's population.

With 70% of students citing rising costs as a barrier to attending college, increasing the income threshold is a crucial step towards ensuring that TAP remains an accessible and relevant resource for a broader spectrum of families. Moreover, this adjustment aligns with the broader goal of promoting diversity on college campuses, especially in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to strike down affirmative action programs.

Mitigating Enrollment Decline and Campus Cutbacks

The legislators argue that an enhanced TAP award can play a pivotal role in reversing the decline in student enrollment at SUNY campuses, including instances of cutbacks and closures. Fahy points to the adverse effects on campuses in Potsdam and Fredonia, as well as the announced closure of the St. Rose campus in her Albany district. By providing more robust financial support, TAP could potentially encourage more students to pursue higher education, thereby revitalizing campuses and ensuring their sustainability.

Addressing Decades of Financial Neglect

Sen. Stavisky emphasizes the need to rectify what she refers to as decades of financial neglect of public colleges and universities in the state. The decline in state support has resulted in students bearing the brunt of the costs, and Stavisky advocates for a renewed commitment from the state to reinvest in higher education. Her focus on addressing the underlying financial challenges faced by public institutions complements the proposed changes to TAP, creating a more comprehensive strategy to strengthen higher education in New York.

Bills in Support of TAP Reforms

Alongside Fahy and Stavisky's proposals, there are bills in both the Senate and Assembly that seek to extend the number of years someone is eligible for TAP and increase the minimum award to $1,000. SUNY Chancellor John King has voiced his support for the TAP increase, underlining its importance in sustaining and expanding access to higher education.

As New York grapples with a $4.3 billion budget gap, the fate of TAP hangs in the balance. Advocates hope that the proposed reforms find a place in the state budget, recognizing the critical role that TAP plays in fostering educational equity and diversity. With the challenges posed by inflation, stagnant income thresholds, and declining financial support for public institutions, revitalizing TAP is not just about safeguarding the program's legacy but ensuring that it remains a catalyst for upward mobility and educational opportunity for generations to come.